Skip to content

Follow-up from "Create a new SrtSteam object"

The following discussion from !116 (merged) should be addressed:

  • @smcv started a discussion: (+1 comment)

    My opinion is "sure, why not". It doesn't gain us much, but it doesn't have much cost either.

    I did wonder whether it should be SrtSteamInstallation rather than SrtSteam, but we might as well stay consistent with what we already had.

    If we are going to make SrtSteam public API, then we should probably have a SrtSteam *srt_system_info_get_steam_details (SrtSystemInfo *) to complement srt_system_info_get_steam_issues().